Aerden (aerden) wrote,
Aerden
aerden

The Modianus Censorial Justification - Short and Sweet

This is a nice, concise description of the whole controversy. I like it.

* * *

Equestria Iunia Laeca M. Valerio Potito sal.

1. The Consuls had the authority to interpret the law.
2. Per their interpretation, the law did not disallow Modianus from
running.
3. The Tribunes had the authority to interpret the law differently
and veto the Consuls' interpretation.
4. This veto had to be done prior to the start of the election.
5. It was not done prior to the start of the election.
6. Modianus was elected by a large margin by Nova Roma citizens.

End of story. Where is your confusion?
Tags: nova roma
Subscribe

  • Spiral Herb Bread Recipe Notes

    Bread Recipe Notes I saw this on Youtube and can’t find the video again. Wahhh! It had foreign-language captions with a lot of commenters from…

  • Sweet Potato Casserole Recipe

    I am making this for the Grace Episcopal Dinner Church Thanksgiving meal. Ingredients For the casserole: 1 (29 oz) can sweet potatoes, drained…

  • Tiramisu Recipe

    Ideally, the eggs and mascarpone should be at room temperature when you make this recipe so they will blend together well. Recipe by Chef Dennis…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

  • 0 comments