?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Aerden
aerden
.::.::...... ..


September 2019
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30

Jump back February 19th, 2011 Go forward

Should websites like Wikileaks be defended for sharing confidential corporate and government information with the public, and why?


The information on the Wikileaks site is confidential. Therefore, it should not be shared except among whomever it is intended to be privy to.

Granted, I've seen some interesting stuff mentioned on the news coming from that site, and I haven't heard of anyone being killed as a direct result of the leaked information--yet. It might not be as dangerous a thing as we at first feared. I'm not willing to bet money on that thought, though. Since I don't move in diplomatic or national security circles, I don't know what or how much damage the leaking of this information has already caused. Nor, I suspect, do most of the people who will comment on this question. Those who do move in such circles will not be commenting here.

I prefer to err on the side of caution, and I hope the site can be shut down--though that might be closing the barn door after the horse has escaped.

Dream, the night of 02/18/2011:

I dreamed I was standing on the street where my office is, but somewhat east of my office. I looked to the left and saw a bus coming. I flagged it down and, to my surprise, it almost immediately pulled over and opened its doors to let me on. It was stopped in the middle of the street, though, and angled such that it was blocking traffic. I glanced to my right and noticed that there was a bus stop immediately to my right. I went up to the door to get on and noticed that I couldn't see into the bus. I called out to the driver, asking what the bus' route number was and got no reply. I asked again and still got no reply. It was still drk inside the bus, and the darkness was beginning to make me feel uneasy. At this point, I woke up.

Analysis, not Interpretation: The first notable thing about this dream is that it was extremely short, so I was able to recall the entirety of it clearly upon awakening, which enabled me to analyze it in much more clarity than I would have been able to for a longer dream. I noticed that there are three different components to the dream.

1. The primary action.
2. Elements created to explain or make the primary action seem logical.
3. Unexplained elements of the dream.

Primary Action: The bus and my reaction to it are the primary elements of this dream. They are what the dream is about. I see a bus, I flag it down, I sense possible danger and question the situation.

Logical Explanations: The appearance of a bus stop where none exists on the real street occurred to explain why the bus stopped so suddenly, right where I needed it to stop. Explanatory elements are most likely to be memories.

Unexplained Elements: No real bus would just stop in the middle of a street and block traffic to pick up a passenger. My feeling is that this happens because the brain just wants to get the general point across, without going into much detail. The scene was set; further details are unnecessary.

(More discussion later; I have to leave for now. Comments?)

Current Mood: contemplativecontemplative
Jump back February 19th, 2011 Go forward